WebIn Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421 (D.C. Cir. 1983), decided after this petition for review had been filed, we addressed the issue of the timing of appeals from the decisions of … WebAug 14, 2012 · level of extreme hardship. Marquez-Medina v. INS, 765 F.2d 673 (7th Cir. 1985); Moore v. INS, 715 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1983); Matter of Chumpitazi, supra. Similarly, the readjustment of an alien to life in his native country after having spent a number of years in the United States is not the type of hardship that is characterized as extreme, since
DEVINE v. WHITE 711 F.2d 1082 (1983) 2d108211599
WebUSDA, 605 F. Supp. 2d 230, 237- 38 (D.D.C. 2009) . 8 U.S.C. § 1202(f) (Immigration and Nationality Act) Certain records pertaining to the issuance or refusal of visas to enter the United States. Medina -Hincapie v. Dep ’t of State, 700 F.2d 737, 741- 42 (D.C. Cir. 1983); DeLaurentiis v. Haig , 686 F.2d 192, 194 (3d Cir. 1982); Assadi v. Dep ... WebDonald J. Devine, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Petitioner, v. Harold C. White, Arbitrator, American Federation Ofgovernment Employees, National Border Patrolcouncil, and Noe Lopez, Respondents, 711 F.2d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1983) :: Justia immigration news in the us
Case Index - Duke University
WebSep 5, 1997 · We also cannot agree with the argument that IDEA compels a contrary result in this case. First, Devine cites two cases, Mountain View — Los Altos Union High Sch. Dist. v. Sharron B.H., 709 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1983), and Vander Malle v. Ambach, 673 F.2d 49 (2d Cir.1982), for the proposition that IDEA accords parents the right to bring actions on ... WebWe agree, though, with the court in Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421, 441 (D.C. Cir. 1983), that "harmful error" applies in determining whether the particular grievant has been prejudiced (even though we also think, as discussed below, that an arbitral award can nevertheless be based on collective bargaining violations important to the union but ... In Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421 (D.C. Cir. 1983), decided after this petition for review had been filed, we addressed the issue of the timing of appeals from the decisions of arbitrators, holding that OPM was neither required nor permitted to ask the arbitrator to reconsider his decision, and that such action would not toll the thirty-day ... list of the states and their abbreviations